A simple word used by South Africa’s head coach Shukri Conrad during the India-South Africa Test series has created a major debate. After South Africa set a huge target for India in the second Test in Guwahati, Conrad said his team wanted India to “grovel.”
This single word upset many Indian fans, former cricketers, and even some South African players. The controversy has opened an important discussion about language, history, and respect in international cricket.
What Did Conrad Actually Say?
Conrad explained that South Africa batted longer so that India would feel tired, pressured, and under stress. He used the line that they wanted India to “really grovel.” In simple English, he meant they wanted India to work very hard and struggle to save the match.
However, the tone of the comment and the timing, right after a dominant win, made the statement sound arrogant and disrespectful to many people.
What Does the Word “Grovel” Mean?
Normally, “grovel” means to act in a very humble, submissive, or low manner. It can also mean to “To act in a very humble or low way, as if trying too hard to please someone, say sorry, or even behave like you are almost crawling.”
The word itself is not a racist term. But in cricket, it carries a painful history that makes it sensitive.
Why the Word Is Sensitive in Cricket
In 1976, England captain Tony Greig used the phrase “make them grovel” before a series against the West Indies. Because Greig was a white South African-born cricketer and the West Indies team was largely Black, his comment was widely viewed as racist and colonial in tone.
That moment became one of the most hurtful and controversial episodes in cricket history. The West Indies team played with extra fire after that comment and went on to dominate world cricket.
Because of this background, the word “grovel” is not just any word in cricket. It carries a strong connection to a time when players from certain races were spoken to in a demeaning way.
Also read: ICC T20 World Cup 2026: India vs Pakistan on February 15 – Full Fixtures and Groups explained
Is “Grovel” a Racist Word? A Clear View
- By definition: No, it is not considered a racist word.
- In cricket history: Yes, it has been used in a racially charged way in the past.
- Today: The word is seen as problematic mainly because of its historical connection and the emotions attached to it.
So the anger is not just about the dictionary meaning, it is about context, history, and sensitivity.
What This Controversy Teaches Us
This incident shows how words carry weight far beyond their basic meaning. In a sport watched by millions across cultures, coaches and players need to understand the history behind certain terms. Intent matters, but impact matters even more.
Fans expect players and officials to compete hard on the field but speak respectfully off it. When language touches on old wounds, whether intentionally or not, it can create unnecessary tension.
Conclusion
Shukri Conrad’s use of the word “grovel” has angered many Indian fans because it reminded them of a past incident where the same word carried racial and colonial undertones.
While the word itself is not racist, its place in cricket history makes it sensitive. This controversy is a reminder that language in sport should be used with care, especially in a global and diverse cricketing world.
Written by Kinjal Walantra