Synopsis: U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly accused banks of undermining his crypto legislative agenda, demanding that Congress move swiftly to pass the CLARITY Act the next major piece of cryptocurrency market structure legislation.
The current standoff is rooted in two pieces of legislation that form the backbone of the Trump administration’s digital asset strategy.
The first, the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act), was signed into law by President Trump in July 2025 the first major federal crypto legislation ever enacted in the United States.
The law establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoin issuers, requiring them to back stablecoins on a one-to-one basis with U.S. dollars or similarly low-risk assets. Crucially, it prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield directly to holders. However, the law does not explicitly bar third-party platforms such as crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken from offering yield to users who hold stablecoins.
The second bill, the CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act), passed the House of Representatives in July 2025 by a bipartisan vote of 294 to 134. It would establish clear regulatory jurisdiction over digital assets, dividing oversight responsibilities between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The CLARITY Act has since stalled in the Senate and has yet to become law.
Trump’s Warning to Banks
On Tuesday, March 4, 2026, President Trump took to his Truth Social platform to express frustration with the banking industry, which he accused of sabotaging both pieces of legislation.
“The Genius Act is being threatened and undermined by the Banks, and that is unacceptable We are not going to allow it,” Trump wrote. He followed up: “The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don’t get The Clarity Act taken care of.”
Trump called on banks to stop obstructing the process: “The Banks should not be trying to undercut The Genius Act, or hold The Clarity Act hostage. They need to make a good deal with the Crypto Industry because that’s what’s in the best interest of the American People.”
The president has framed the passage of the CLARITY Act as essential for cementing U.S. leadership in digital assets and has urged Congress to act before midterm elections in November 2026, a race in which crypto lobbying groups have raised more than $200 million in support of industry-friendly candidates.
The Stablecoin Yield Dispute
At the heart of the conflict is a gap in the GENIUS Act. While the law bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders, it left open the question of whether third-party platforms could distribute yield on behalf of users. Banking groups have labeled this arrangement a legal loophole, arguing that exchanges offering yield of 4–5% on stablecoin deposits could trigger significant deposit outflows from traditional bank accounts, threatening financial stability.
Banking trade groups have pushed for the CLARITY Act to include a blanket ban on all stablecoin yield payments whether from issuers or third-party platforms. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, speaking on the same day as Trump’s post, argued that firms offering stablecoin yield are functioning like banks and should be regulated as such, citing capital requirements, FDIC insurance, and anti-money-laundering obligations as standards that crypto firms do not currently meet.
The crypto industry has pushed back firmly. A coalition of over 125 companies including Coinbase, Gemini, and Kraken has argued that the ability to earn yield on stablecoins is fundamental to their competitive appeal and was implicitly permitted under the GENIUS Act. Reopening the yield question, they contend, would undermine the regulatory certainty the law was designed to provide.
Also Read: What Does a “Fully Onchain Economy” Actually Mean? Let’s Take the Case of Bermuda
Negotiations Stall
The White House brokered at least two meetings between banking and crypto industry representatives in early February 2026, but neither produced a compromise. Banking representatives arrived at the table with draft proposals demanding a total ban on stablecoin yield a position the crypto side rejected as anticompetitive.
Progress had already been disrupted in January, when the Senate Banking Committee indefinitely postponed a scheduled markup vote on the CLARITY Act after Coinbase withdrew its support, citing proposed amendments it said would unfairly restrict stablecoin rewards programs. The White House had set a tentative end-of-February deadline for a resolution; that deadline passed without a deal.
Representative French Hill, Chair of the House Financial Services Committee, suggested a path forward: if the Senate cannot advance its own version of the bill, it should simply take up the House’s version of the CLARITY Act. Senator Cynthia Lummis echoed Trump’s urgency, reposting his message with the comment: “America can’t afford to wait. Congress must move quickly to pass the Clarity Act.”
What’s at Stake
The CLARITY Act remains the missing piece of the Trump administration’s digital asset framework. Together with the GENIUS Act, it would define the regulatory landscape for the entire U.S. crypto market not just stablecoins, but the broader ecosystem of digital assets. Without it, analysts warn, regulatory ambiguity will continue to discourage institutional investment and risk pushing crypto companies and innovation to more welcoming jurisdictions abroad.
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott has expressed optimism that the bill can still be passed before the midterm elections, with reports suggesting the committee is targeting a markup vote in mid-to-late March 2026.
Written by Parvati Anilkumar
