Synopsis:- A year-on-year jump in profit was not enough to hold up the stock today, with the counter sliding as investors zeroed in on a sharp sequential fall in revenue and execution within the EPC business, a reminder that quarter-on-quarter momentum still matters more to this market than annual comparisons.
Shares of a leading renewable energy EPC company slid sharply on Thursday even after it reported a healthy year-on-year jump in profit for the June quarter, as investors chose to focus instead on a steep sequential drop in revenue and execution. The stock fell after the company’s board approved its unaudited results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
With a market capitalization of Rs. 5,160.35 crore, the shares of Sterling and Wilson Renewable Energy Limited were trading at Rs. 221.10 apiece, down 7.65 percent from its previous closing price of Rs. 239.41 apiece. The stock touched an intraday low of Rs. 218.79 against a high of Rs. 241.77.
Q1 FY27 Results
On a consolidated basis, revenue from operations fell 9.73 percent year on year to Rs. 1,590 crore from Rs. 1,762 crore in the June 25 quarter. On a Quarter-on Quarter basis, the fall was much more exponential. Revenue fell 18.3 percent from March 26 Quarter of Rs.1,946 crore.
Net profit rose to Rs. 53.3 crore from Rs. 38.7 crore in the same quarter last year. However, profit took a huge hit if compared Quarter-on-Quarter basis, from Rs. 142 crore, showing a 62.38 percent drop.
The EPC business, which makes up close to 95 percent of overall revenue, softened noticeably on a sequential basis, with segment revenue falling to Rs. 1,504 crore from Rs. 1,863 crore in the fourth quarter of FY26.
The Operation & Maintenance business moved in the opposite direction, with revenue rising 40 percent year-on-year to Rs. 84.8 crore from Rs. 60.3 crore, a trend the company has flagged as part of a deliberate push to diversify revenue away from pure project execution and toward recurring service income.
Profitability held up reasonably well despite the lower execution volumes. The EPC segment generated Rs. 137.7 crore in segment profit for the quarter, while the O&M segment’s profit rose to Rs. 18.2 crore, together helping the company report a consolidated profit before tax of Rs. 56.7 crore.
That the company could keep segment margins broadly intact even as EPC revenue fell by close to a fifth sequentially suggests the underlying cost discipline on ongoing projects has not slipped, even if the pace of billing has.
Record Order Book and an Egypt Breakthrough
The company’s press release accompanying the results points to a materially different story on the order side. Unexecuted Order Value climbed to approximately Rs. 13,000 crore, which the company describes as its highest since the pandemic, while the domestic EPC order book stands at roughly Rs. 7,900 crore with gross margins holding in the 9 to 10 percent range. The bid pipeline is now above 27.7 GW, spanning solar, wind, battery storage and third-party O&M work.
The standout addition this quarter came from outside India. Sterling and Wilson has entered a 50-50 joint venture with a contractor in the MENA region for the West Minya Solar Power Project in Egypt’s Minya Governorate, a contract valued at approximately USD 560 million, or roughly Rs. 5,320 crore at an exchange rate of Rs. 95 to the dollar.
The project combines a 1,000 megawatt-AC solar plant with a 600 megawatt-hour battery storage system, and is expected to rank among Egypt’s largest utility-scale renewable developments once complete.
Because the contract sits inside a 50 percent joint venture, only half of that value will flow through to the company’s own order book, a distinction investors should keep in mind when comparing it against the wholly-owned domestic backlog.
Management said the company expects its order momentum to reflect in both revenue and profit over the coming months, pointing to the size of the order book as evidence of customer confidence in the company’s execution track record.
Balance Sheet Improves
Capital employed improved to Rs. 708 crore at the end of the June quarter from Rs. 651 crore at the close of FY26. More notably, the EPC segment’s own capital employed turned positive at Rs. 1.8 crore, having ended FY26 in negative territory. Term debt also fell by roughly Rs. 160 crore sequentially on account of scheduled repayments.
A negative capital employed position in a project business usually signals that liabilities tied to ongoing execution exceed the assets deployed against them; a swing back into positive territory, even a modest one, points to better working capital management around EPC billing and collections this quarter, and the debt reduction adds to that picture of a tightening balance sheet even as topline growth slowed.
Why the Stock Fell Anyway
The market’s reaction points to a familiar pattern in how EPC stocks get priced: order books and annual profit growth matter, but the street watches quarter-on-quarter execution momentum just as closely.
A near-20 percent sequential fall in revenue, even one the company attributes to seasonality, was always going to draw scrutiny in a business where investors track billing run-rates as a proxy for how efficiently a large order backlog is being converted into cash.
The auditor’s review report carried the same emphasis-of-matter notes seen in recent quarters relating to the 2021 indemnity agreement with the erstwhile promoter group and Reliance New Energy, along with a Rs. 706.61 crore net exposure to a wholly owned subsidiary that management continues to describe as recoverable.
What Investors Should Watch
Investors should track two things from here. First, whether the sequential revenue dip proves to be the seasonal blip management describes or the start of a slower execution phase, something only the September quarter print can confirm.
Second, the pace of order inflow: FY26 order intake crossed Rs. 10,000 crore for the first time, and how quickly that backlog converts into billed EPC revenue over the coming quarters will matter more to the stock than any single quarter’s year-on-year profit comparison.
It is also worth noting that the year-ago comparison itself is a low base. The Rs. 38.7 crore profit reported in the June 2025 quarter came in the same year that Sterling & Wilson took a Rs. 2,802.18 crore exceptional charge on its books, tied to an impairment on its investment in a wholly owned subsidiary.
A 37.7 percent jump in profit off a base that was already depressed by unrelated one-time charges is a real improvement, but not one that changes the underlying execution story on its own. The stock’s move today suggests the market read the quarter primarily through that lens, weighing the sequential slowdown in the core EPC business more heavily than the year-on-year profit optics.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on tradebrains.in are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Investing in equities poses a risk of financial losses. Investors must therefore exercise due caution while investing or trading in stocks. Trade Brains Technologies Private Limited or the author are not liable for any losses caused as a result of the decision based on this article. Please consult your investment advisor before investing.
